Why Anthropic and the US Government are Feuding Over AI

The US Department of War, in its plans to weaponise AI for domestic surveillance and fully autonomous weapons, has locked horns with AI pioneer Anthropic.
Being one of the first AI companies to work with the US government and military, Anthropic tools are widely deployed in various levels and have been engaged in classified operations since 2024.
The fallout happened as US President Donald Trump and Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, pushed the company to remove AI safeguards to allow âany lawful useâ of Anthropicâs technology for military purposes.
The company refused, stating that it could not in âgood conscience accede to their requestâ as legal constraints have not yet caught up with the power of AI.
As Co-Founder and CEO of Anthropic, Dario Amodei explains: âIn a narrow set of cases, we believe AI can undermine, rather than defend, democratic values.
âSome uses are also simply outside the bounds of what todayâs technology can safely and reliably do.
âTwo such use cases have never been included in our contracts with the Department of War and we believe they should not be included now.â
The two cases Dario clarified, includes mass domestic surveillance and fully autonomous weapons.
Trump and Hegseth's Anthropic face off
Following public and private negotiations with Anthropic, where it refused to comply with the Department of War, Pete Hegseth designated the company a âsupply chain riskâ.
The designation could mean that organisations engaged in business with the US military will no longer be able to deal with Anthropic.
The AI company retorted saying that: âNo amount of intimidation or punishment from the Department of War will change our position on mass domestic surveillance or fully autonomous weapons.â
Anthropic also announced that it will challenge the designation in a court of law.
âDesignating Anthropic as a supply chain risk would be an unprecedented action â one historically reserved for US adversaries, never before publicly applied to an American company,â the company notes in a statement.
âWe are deeply saddened by these developments. As the first frontier AI company to deploy models in the US governmentâs classified networks, Anthropic has supported American warfighters since June 2024 and has every intention of continuing to do so.â
Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social ordering all federal agencies to stop using Anthropic.
âWe donât need it, we donât want it and will not do business with them again! There will be a six month phase out period for agencies like the Department of War who are using Anthropicâs products, at various levels," he said.
AI enabled mass surveillance
AI driven mass surveillance, Darios notes: âpresents serious, novel risks to our fundamental libertiesâ.
The legality of surveillance is questioned by Dario saying that laws haven't caught up with the capabilities of AI, which he explains can be used to paint a comprehensive picture of a personâs life from scattered data points.
Dario points out: âUnder current law, the government can purchase detailed records of Americansâ movements, web browsing and associations from public sources without obtaining a warrant, a practice the Intelligence Community has acknowledged raises privacy concerns and that has generated bipartisan opposition in Congress.â
Anthropicâs refusal to comply with the Pentagon's demands hinges on its belief that âmass domestic surveillance of Americans constitutes a violation of fundamental rights".
AI-powered, fully automated weapons
While the company acknowledges that AI enabled autonomous weapons will be necessary to national defence, Anthropic says todayâs systems have a long way to go before achieving the level of reliability needed for such applications.
Autonomous weapons, Dario says, require guardrails that simply donât exist today and autonomous systems would require oversight as the systems lack the critical judgement of experienced troops, making fully autonomous weapons dangerous to soldiers and civilians.
Anthropicâs offer to work with the Department of War on R&D to improve the technology for weapons use was not accepted.
Dario Amodeiâs statement acknowledged that it is the Departmentâs prerogative to select contractors most aligned with their vision, but expressed hope that they would reconsider.
The CEOâs statement also added cooperative sentiment in case the Pentagon shall decide otherwise: âShould the Department choose to offboard Anthropic, we will work to enable a smooth transition to another provider, avoiding any disruption to ongoing military planning, operations or other critical missions.â
Despite this, Trumpâs post accelerated hostility when he wrote: âAnthropic better get their act together and be helpful during this phase out period or I will use the Full Power of the Presidency to make them comply, with major civil and criminal consequences to follow.â



