The Future of Work Isn't Artificial, Says HPE CPO

Share this article
Share this article
Prioritise Us on Google
Stacy Dillow, Chief People Officer at HPE (Credit: HPE)
Stacy Dillow, HPE's Chief People Officer, says that org charts and pay models built for a static world are failing and the fix is to redesign around AI

"We are still running companies built for a world that no longer exists," says Stacy Dillow, Chief People Officer at HPE on LinkedIn.

The issue at hand here is the fact that the infrastructure layer for AI deployment has received most of the attention at enterprise scale, while the organisational layer has not.

Writing on LinkedIn, Stacy points at the org charts, job descriptions and pay models designed for a time when work was fixed and humans did everything.

Stacy Dillow, Matt Messick, Maeve Culloty, and Ajit Chouhan for sharing your amazing perspectives.

She puts forward this case after having moderated a panel on workforce transformation at the company's Discover conference in June.

Why Legacy Structures Create Friction

Stacy is not claiming that AI has already remade business operations. She argues that work has become fluid and that decision velocity now exceeds the approval chains built to govern it.

Every AI investment carries an implicit workforce decision. Most organisations layer AI onto existing structures when the situation could require new design from the ground up.

"The future of work isn't artificial," Stacy says, "it's AI-powered and human-led."

When an autonomous agent can approve a transaction that previously required managerial sign-off, the layers of approval that defined the old org chart stop functioning as control. They become friction instead.

What Changes for the People Function

According to Stacy, the role of the Chief People Officer shifts when AI begins to determine where investment and headcount are allocated. People strategy and financial strategy become the same conversation.

The future of work isn't artificial, it's AI-powered and human-led

Stacy Dillow, Chief People Officer at Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)

What changes for the people function

According to Stacy, the role of the Chief People Officer shifts when AI begins to determine where investment and headcount are allocated. People strategy and financial strategy become the same conversation.

Stacy's approach is to re-architect three areas simultaneously:
  • Skills, so the workforce organises around tasks where humans perform best
  • Organisations, so structure reflects how work actually flows
  • Investment, so every pound spent on AI is evaluated as a workforce decision
Youtube Placeholder

The goal, in her words, is to "leverage AI to remove what's mechanical so humans can focus on what's meaningful".

The line is simple but the execution could involve redrawn roles, retraining programmes and revised models for calculating staff costs.

Surveys suggest roughly nine in 10 senior HR leaders expect AI to reshape the nature of jobs rather than simply automate individual tasks.

The CPO now has oversight on every AI budget line because each one affects headcount and cost structure.

How HPE's Own Transformation Illustrates the Challenge

HPE dedicated most of Discover 2026 to infrastructure rather than people strategy. That makes Stacy's case stronger.

Antonio Neri, President and CEO of HPE (Credit: HPE)

"As AI becomes more autonomous, organisations need a new architecture to run it securely, govern it responsibly and scale it economically," says Antonio Neri President and Chief Executive Officer at HPE, in the company's Discover 2026 announcement.

Replace architecture with organisation and the statement describes Stacy's argument about workforce design.

Her panel included Maeve Culloty, who leads HPE Financial Services, HR leader Ajit Chouhan and Matt Messick, Chief Information Officer at Dallas Cowboys.

The panel returned repeatedly to one point. Any company that leaves its organisational structure unchanged will spend the next cycle following a transformation it could have led. Work must be architected because it will not architect itself.

Executives