Newsom Says No: California Governor Blocks Divisive AI Bill

In a significant event for the AI industry, California Governor Gavin Newsom has vetoed a controversial Senate Bill that aims to address safety issues surrounding AI use and development.

Speaking on the announcement, Gavin's decision to veto the bill was because it "does not take into account whether an Al system is deployed in high-risk environments, involves critical decision-making or the use of sensitive data." 

The bill would have required the most advanced AI models to undergo safety testing, implement a "kill switch" for emergencies, and submit to official oversight for the development of powerful "Frontier Models". 

Yet the bill had sparked intense debate within Silicon Valley and followed months of lobbying and public discourse, revealing deep divisions within the tech industry and highlighting the complex political landscape surrounding AI regulation.

Examining the SB-1047

Silicon Valley found itself divided on the merits of SB-1047. While tech giants like Google, Meta, and OpenAI voiced strong opposition to the bill, warning that it could hinder innovation and potentially drive AI development out of California, other industry leaders came out in support of the proposed regulations.

Elon Musk, owner of X (formerly Twitter) and developer of the AI system Grok, publicly backed the bill, stating on his platform, "This is a tough call and will make some people upset, but, all things considered, I think California should probably pass the SB 1047 AI safety bill." 

Musk's support was echoed by Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, who argued that the bill was necessary to protect the public and increase transparency in the industry.

Adding to the complexity of the situation, eight members of the US Congress, including Representative Nancy Pelosi, urged Governor Newsom to veto SB-1047. Pelosi described the measure as "well-intentioned but ill-informed," reflecting concerns that state-level regulation could create a patchwork of conflicting rules across the country.

The governor's decision has left the AI industry in California without binding restrictions from US policymakers, a situation that Senator Wiener criticised as potentially dangerous given "Congress's continuing paralysis around regulating the tech industry in any meaningful way."

Future of legislation 

This outcome underscores the challenges of regulating a rapidly evolving technology at the state level. OpenAI, while opposing SB-1047, has thrown its support behind another California bill, AB 3211, which would require tech companies to label AI-generated content. This selective approach to regulation highlights the nuanced positions that companies are taking in the ongoing debate over AI governance.

The veto of SB-1047 also raises questions about the future of AI regulation in the US. With federal efforts to impose safeguards on AI stalled, and now a significant state-level initiative blocked, the path forward for meaningful oversight of AI development remains unclear.

Governor Newsom has announced plans to work with leading experts to develop alternative safeguards for AI technology, suggesting that the conversation around AI regulation in California is far from over.

With powerful AI systems continuing to advance rapidly, and the EU having implemented their own AI Bill, the pressure for some form of regulation is likely to grow.

Yet whether its US form will come from congress, or be legislated at the federal level, remains to be seen.

******

Make sure you check out the latest edition of AI Magazine and also sign up to our global conference series - Tech & AI LIVE 2024

******

AI Magazine is a BizClik brand